Notes on being adaptable. Plus, the cell isn’t a factory and work isn’t war
View in browser
Longview Header
Fenwick Longview Issue 87, May 9, 2024—Forwarded this? Sign up yourself

  

How To Build a Highly Adaptive Content Program

 

Over time, buildings come to resemble their occupants. It happens too slowly for us to notice. But in a time-lapse, they come alive—shifting, warping, and growing. Furniture flies about, new roofs unfurl, the porch grows walls, and the garage grows a second story. 

 

In this way, buildings adapt to our needs. We think of them as unchanging. But in fact, they learn and the best ones are built to be “highly adaptive” from the start, says Stewart Brand, author of How Buildings Learn.

 

As I read his book, I thought gosh, this sounds like a website. Or a content program. Today, I share a few content operations lessons I think we can credibly draw from architecture.

 

 

But first, a primer: Buildings are made of layers

 

Each layer has a distinct function and adapts at a different timescale. Furniture is easy to move and changes often. Wallpaper, less so, and the walls, rarely. The fast-changing layers blunt the impact of shifting tastes and moods and protect the site. That site, in turn, provides a structure upon which all else can grow.

 

When the ephemeral layers are not enough, those changes penetrate to the skin and structure—the occupants demolish a wall or add a new story.

      stewart brand how buildings learn diagram-1

       

      Can we reimagine this as a diagram of your content program? I think we can.

      FN graphic - how content learns layers

       

      Staring at this diagram, I actually do find it useful. It places those layers into a hierarchy, and clarifies the relationships. It suggests two forces shape our content marketing work:

       

      1. Identities resist change and keep you recognizable: A brand works like mortar—you can build upon it. If your startup decides it’s going to have a space theme, those rocket ships and planetary motifs form a unique architecture to which all else is affixed. This creates what we at Fenwick call a creative constraint: It helpfully narrows the cone of possibility to just what we need to focus on.

       

      2. Content encourages change: On the opposite end, words, graphics, and ideas change rapidly. Daily, even. If they conform to that identity, they don’t change too much, so the brand is palpable in everything. But it’s also highly responsive to the world outside. If a new group of buyers starts to react to your work and you start to write for them, that’s positive change seeping in. Over time, it can influence the architecture.

       

      This is how Salesforce’s mascot of a kid in a raccoon suit came about. A single designer invented it to make a developer conference more fun. People loved it. It became a pantheon of characters that are now at the forefront of Salesforce’s identity.

       

      All very interesting, you might say. But how can I apply this to my job? Five ways:

       

      1. Invest in an identity

       

      Most B2Bs are built on a proverbial foundation of mud. The messaging is nabbed from a top competitor. The logo, literal. The color palette, a mere afterthought—and probably light blue. (It’s always light blue.) And the mission? So empty it echoes: “To exit, bro.”

       

      Upon such a foundation all else slides. There’s no hammering in a new series of posts because they wash away with each new rain. 

       

      The best thing you can have for a content program is a highly considered foundation. One which imbues the brand with strongly defined enough person-like qualities that a creative can ask, “What would the company do?” and know—instantly—because the identity is clear. 

       

      Take the HR and employee sentiment software ListenUp, for example. All the writing and design direction you need is in the name: Listen carefully, and depict things getting better. Listen, up.

       

      Or take Gusto, the HR and payroll platform. Their brand is all about people. When a designer creates a thumbnail for a webinar, the on-brand thing is to introduce people by their name, not their title.

       

      Meet Jaclyn

       

      2. Make changes to the cheapest possible layer

       

      “As a designer, you should avoid such classic mistakes as solving a five-minute problem with a fifty-year solution, and vice versa,” writes Stewart Brand in How Buildings Learn. In content terms: Run your experiments on the cheapest possible layer. 

       

      If you are no longer liking your brand, experiment in the content, first. If you think you need a new website content management system (CMS), try manually updating the user experience to validate that hypothesis.

       

      FN graphic - test on content program layers

       

       

      3. Assign people to their preferred layer

       

      Everyone likes operating at different speeds. Let them. Some folks will want to move slowly and thoughtfully and while they make a frustrating production designer, they’d be an adept brand-thinker. And conversely, someone who thrills in frequent experimentation might enjoy UX design more than brand work.

       

      Content → Wants to publish new things continuously 

      UX/Ops → Loves to talk to customers, budding systems thinker

      Technology → Likes to organize, creates order

      Style → Wants to enforce what exists and teach others

      Website → Loves elegantly simple and enduring systems

      Identity → Loves to pause, reflect, and perfect

       

       

      4. Conduct vigorous ongoing maintenance

       

      “Every building is potentially immortal, but very few last the life of a human,” writes Brand. Why? Because they don’t get properly maintained. “No maintenance, no building.” 

       

      Nobody ever maintains buildings or content programs like we should. Our brains aren’t wired for it. It’s difficult to explain to a boss why you should pause this quarter’s work to avoid some abstract future threat. But we must. If you aren’t labeling and foldering as you go, that eventual audit will be a nightmare.

       

      When Fenwick gets called in to assist with a content operation, it usually has termites. They never invested in an identity nor sought a true and unique informational advantage, and so produced hundreds of off-topic, under-quality assets, and it’s basically a teardown. They had a content system, but it was mal-adapted to its environment.

       

      If you want an adaptive structure—if you want to be the team who has time to experiment with new tech as it emerges—commit to a regime of 20% of time spent on maintenance. 

       

      Maintenance ideas: 

      • Enforce a singular, searchable content repository
      • Label and organize graphics and templates as you go
      • Manage and abide by a backlog
      • Take the time to style or use InDesign and Figma files
      • Audit content as you go, so there’s a manifest
      • Maintain your templates monthly
      • Recalibrate performance monthly
      • Recalibrate story points quarterly
      • Recalibrate promotions semesterly
      • Refactor visuals yearly
      • Investigate new time-saving tech yearly
      • Every year, take a few weeks off so everyone can reset

       

      Worth a read: Welcome to the secret order of the squirrel.

       

       

      5. Leave some decisions to future tenants

       

      There is a cathedral in Spain that’s been under construction for 142 years. What interests me is that the architect Antoni Gaudí planned the entire thing but left some frescoes blank. He knew the project would outlast him and wanted future architects to feel a sense of ownership.

       

      This is why Stewart Brand praises brick buildings over the brutalist cement monstrosities that sprung up over the last fifty years. Cement is cheap and unyielding. Whereas brick is beautifully composable—you can easily knock out new windows and doors. So too, well-maintained wood. There’s something about the simple, natural materials that let a building learn.

       

      By analogy, leave some decisions up to your content creators. You want a tough “shell-and-core” identity that can withstand the elements, but it not be impervious to improvement. In the end, you’re trying to create a form to endure—which requires adaptation.

       

       

      How to apply today's story

       

      Have you ever diagrammed your own content program? Pause for 30 minutes today and try. What can you glean from how buildings learn? Is there anything you can do less of? Looking at Fenwick’s own, we spend almost all our time on identity, website, and style. We could publish more.

       

      Post about this story on LinkedIn

       

      In the next issue

       

      What we’ve learned from our first writing class cohort.

       

      Inside Fenwick

       

      The team is producing a murder mystery for a client. I cannot wait to tell you about it soon. Clarissa’s designing and managing a Webflow website, Carina’s fully rewritten our course landing page based on great feedback, Donnique’s helping Peter get philosophical about chatbots, and one of our partners is building Amanda’s emails while she’s on a beach in Thailand presumably drinking from a coconut with a tiny parasol.

       

      Hey actually, a question for you: Fenwick has an archive of coming up on 10 years of content marketing material. We created a course. What do you think should we create next? (You can reply to this email.)

      • Coaching sessions
      • Playbooks
      • Live training scenarios
      • A LinkedIn Live interview series
      • More courses

       

      In other news, kittens. (Yes, Carina crocheted a little cap.)

       

      Screen Shot 2024-05-07 at 2.09.57 PM

       

      Worth reading

       

      The cell is not a factory. When analogies constrain our thinking. Great long read. (I’m really crushing on this magazine.)

       

      The client. Sent to us by a client, so you know they’re a keeper.

       

      Work isn’t war. 

       

      Impulsoria. A neat Victorian analogy.

       

      Wild Memory Radio. How is WeTransfer so consistently fascinating?

       

      Microsites by Mutiny. My favorite April Fool’s joke this year. 

       

      The Subtext. A brand writing magazine I’ve just discovered. 


      What comes first, copy or design? Trick question. Both.

       

       

      Enjoying Longview? Share with someone you love.

       

      Fenwick, 147 Prince St, Brooklyn, NY 11201, US, (415) 498-0179

      Unsubscribe Manage preferences